When Riyadh Air posted 18 pilot vacancies inside a fortnight this May, the applicant pool that landed in front of its recruiters was split roughly down the middle between FAA and EASA paperwork, and the carrier did not much care which. Gulf regulators validate ICAO-compliant licences from both systems, so for a pilot moving into Jeddah, Doha or Riyadh the FAA-versus-EASA question is close to academic.

It stops being academic the day you want out. A Gulf contract ends, or a family situation changes, and the licence in your bag decides whether your next employer is in Dublin or Dallas. That is when pilots discover the thing the marketing pages bury: at airline level, in either direction, there is no conversion. There is credit against training, and there is a fresh set of exams and checks with a different regulator's name on them.

The only genuine conversion is at private pilot level

The FAA and EASA do have a mutual licensing deal, and it is narrower than most people assume. Annex 3 to the US-EU Bilateral Aviation Safety Agreement, implemented through the Technical Implementation Procedures for Licensing (TIP-L), was approved in November 2020 and took effect in May 2021 according to Sweden's Transportstyrelsen. Italy's ENAC lists the scope precisely: PPL(A), SEP(land), MEP(land), night rating, and single-pilot instrument ratings on single and multi-engine aeroplanes. Aeroplanes only. Nothing commercial.

Inside that box, the process is genuinely light: an application form that doubles as the skill test report, flown with an examiner in the receiving state. Transportstyrelsen adds a detail that catches people out: for the IR, the hours and IFR training you are counting must have been flown after the rating was issued, not during the course.

Two traps sit in the same box. Transportstyrelsen notes that an EASA CPL(A) holder cannot use the BASA route to bring across ratings and must fall back on Article 10 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/723 instead, so the "easy" route closes the moment you hold a commercial licence. And a US certificate issued under 14 CFR 61.75, the piggyback private certificate based on a foreign licence, is excluded from TIP-L. The workaround pilots discuss on European GA forums, get a 61.75 certificate, add an FAA instrument rating to it, then push that IR back into the EASA licence, does not work as written.